The Report reveals one clear, crucial finding: leaders who use LinkedIn to share their human face, voice and values generate a stronger response than their peers. But these leaders are in a small minority.
Of the 100+ leaders analysed, 65% had a LinkedIn profile. While two thirds may seem reasonable, a surprising 45% of these were dormant or ‘inactive’. A further 23% of these were rarely active, with fewer than one post per month.
In fact, only 36% of all 100+ leaders analysed had posted at all in the six month period. When they did post, they were far more likely to talk about work. The Report data shows active leaders were 13x more likely to share ‘work’ posts than ‘human’ posts. This is despite ‘human’ posts being almost 4x more effective at generating public engagement than ‘work’ posts.
We now have evidence for change.
The report surfaces this and other key themes. It shows our LinkedIn feeds are already rich with stories that show the sector’s competence; projects meeting community needs. But its warmth – a key component of trust – is less obvious. Why, and what needs to change? Our research also reveals the empowering effect leaders have on staff when they step up online.
Why aren’t more leaders, and what would compel them to act?
The Report explores perceptions of risk for leaders, and how tweaks to strategy and governance could help clarify the role and value of LinkedIn for the sector. Because there is enormous potential for leaders online, and the future – based on our data – looks increasingly bright.
When leaders are more ‘human’, our data shows they greatly outperform the average – they enjoy 3.5x more followers and generate 5x more public engagements than the average leader on LinkedIn. Reach and influence anyone would value.
The report ends with recommended actions leaders and their teams can implement themselves. Encouragingly, there are already fantastic examples for them to model off – many highlighted in the report.
The example they set reveals the best LinkedIn strategy for public sector leaders: a human-centred one.